← Search

Amber Moore

Madison Heights, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 60W–15L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amber Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-04-10 · EAST-Lindow LOW TRI WOMEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecilia Ortiz-Capisano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-21 · EAST-Lindow LOW TRI WOMEN F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Reid
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-06 · EAST-McLeod 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES · #1 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · EAST-Lindow LOW TRI WOMEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Crites
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
Zoe De Wit / Arielle Gupta
2026-02-21 · EAST-Lindow LOW TRI WOMEN F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Desnor Chigumba
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-02-15 · EAST-McLeod 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES · #1 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · EAST-Lindow LOW TRI WOMEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Joseph
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · EAST-McLeod 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES · #1 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · EAST-Lindow LOW TRI WOMEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · with Angela Carnaghi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-14 · 6EAST-Horn 30 WOMEN Fall SINGLES F2 · #1 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-0, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · 1EAST-Szabo 65 WOMEN COMBO F6 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Carnaghi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 64.8% of games
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 58.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
100%
4W–0L · 71.9% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 72.3% of games
6.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 62% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 67.4% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#2 Singles
15%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe