← Search

Stephanie Pricken

— year-end
33 matches · 15W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Pricken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-06-05 · LanSharks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · LanSharks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Halloran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · LanSharks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · LanSharks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-24 · LanSharks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-20 · Networkers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Brautigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-1, 1-0
L
2025-06-06 · Networkers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-30 · Networkers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-4, 1-0
L
Dana Zimmer / Ricki Eisenstein
2025-05-09 · Networkers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Nan Barash / Pamela Shaw
2025-05-02 · Networkers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-25 · Networkers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audra Shaiko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.7% of games
4.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova