← Search

Kylie Knapp

— year-end
28 matches · 19W–9L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kylie Knapp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
Vickie Kosh / Jennifer Adams
2026-09-12 · Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-07 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Renata Kuperus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Hickman 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lindsay Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Sabrina Davis / Karen King
2026-08-31 · Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · Wilson/Parker Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Waddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-4
L
2026-08-17 · Senter CFCC 18+ 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenna Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-15 · Hickman 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carolyn Hickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · Wilson/Parker Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Waddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · Parker/Glasgow · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-20 · SENTER - 4.0 18+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · Parker/Glasgow · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-08 · SENTER - 4.0 18+ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 58.7% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 53.6% of games
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 69.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
4 matches
#2 Singles
11%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#3 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams