← Search

Angie Schwendeman

Kathleen, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 33W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Angie Schwendeman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-27 · RS-JOINER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-25 · RS-JOINER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · RS-JOINER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patsy Bendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-04 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Beaman-Hackle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Doe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-18 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patsy Bendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-14 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patsy Bendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-30 · HOCO Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patsy Bendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-29 · HOCO Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-28 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Beaman-Hackle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 53.5% of games
4.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 53% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams