← Search

Valerie Beaman-Hackle

— year-end
41 matches · 25W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Valerie Beaman-Hackle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-08-16 · HOCO-BENDALL · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sally Velasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
W
2026-08-10 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacy Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-20 · RS-JOINER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chrystal Wasden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-11 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marian Wharton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-04 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Schwendeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-18 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Joiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-28 · Ludicke Low 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Schwendeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-11-12 · HOCO-LUDICKE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Grady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-09-24 · HOCO-LUDICKE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Ludicke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-03-14 · HOCO-MURRAY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tuti Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 68.8% of games
4.0
50%
11W–11L · 48.5% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams