← Search

Nico Jimeno

— year-end
59 matches · 44W–15L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nico Jimeno to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Kimble, Paul · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Irving
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · Pullen, Jackson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bradley Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Rumbley, Roddy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Adam Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Matthew Jeffries / David Smith
2026-08-16 · Rumbley, Roddy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bobby Bullock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · Kimble, Paul · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Matthew Jeffries / David Smith
2026-05-27 · Rumbley, Roddy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kenneth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · Howard/Kimball-4.0-40's · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin McKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-8
W
2026-05-07 · Merchant, Tom · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Ishee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · Merchant, Tom · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-02 · Charles Bailey JXN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
W
2026-04-30 · Merchant, Tom · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
John Edwards / Paul Perry
2026-04-26 · Charles Bailey JXN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 71.3% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
79.4%
27W–7L · 63.4% of games
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 48.4% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams