← Search

Bradley Fulton

Jackson, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 47W–11L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Bradley Fulton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Jackson/Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Fulton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-8
W
2026-07-14 · Jackson/Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Fulton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-5
W
2026-06-09 · Byrd, Adam · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Dehon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Byrd, Adam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Fulton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Fulton, Bradley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Leggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-07 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Michael Parker / Matthew Woodruff
2026-04-19 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 51.4% of games
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 72.9% of games
3.5
80%
16W–4L · 59.1% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert