← Search

Justin D'Silva

— year-end
49 matches · 30W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Justin D'Silva to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-07-02 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Zimmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · KFranks (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Johnstone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-14 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Franks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-24 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Conlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-17 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rich Pietrykowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-10 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rich Pietrykowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-03 · RPietrykowski (PPRSC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rod Wilkes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
Forrest Stewart / Burns McGarry
2025-12-17 · AWeil (PPRSC); PPRSC JDAAT · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alven Weil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-11-13 · AWeil (PPRSC); PPRSC JDAAT · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Hausmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-20 · #3 Doubles · with Rod Wilkes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.1% of games
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 46.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.6% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe