← Search

David Fox

Lincoln, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add David Fox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Lefler Stempson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Trent Sidders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · Lefler Stempson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trent Sidders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-24 · Ek Murtagh · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bryce Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-08-18 · Lefler Stempson · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with John Jr Lefler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-17 · Ek Murtagh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Santiago Murtagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · Lefler Stempson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Tomasek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · Mandigo/Moguel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pablo Moguel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · Ek/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Andrew Nguyen / Steve Warner
2026-06-30 · Mandigo/Moguel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Weyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Ek/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Mandigo/Moguel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pablo Moguel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-18 · Ek/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 47% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 56.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe