← Search

Ty Schmidt

— year-end
171 matches · 112W–59L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Ty Schmidt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Ek/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · Lubben · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexandra Lubben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Erik Johnson / Royce Klucas
2026-06-25 · Ek/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Ek/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Old Guys Rule · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Bircher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · Lubben · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexandra Lubben mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · Ek/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tan Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · Old Guys Rule · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kreg Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-19 · Old Guys Rule · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Old Guys Rule · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Dean · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.1% of games
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.6% of games
3.5
77.1%
27W–8L · 64.6% of games
4.0
63%
29W–17L · 54.9% of games
7.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.9% of games
8.0
55%
11W–9L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
65.6%
21W–11L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams