← Search

Heather Moss

Hattiesburg, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 46W–17L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Heather Moss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Canebrake 18+ 6.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Jo Goodin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · Canebrake 5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kayla Holcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · Canebrake 5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Catherine Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · Canebrake 18+ 6.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · Roseberry-3.5-4.5-Canebrake · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hannah Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Canebrake 18+ 3.0-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with JULIE BAUGH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Canebrake 18+ 3.0-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with JULIE BAUGH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-07 · canebrake tennis 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · canebrake tennis 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Saulters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Meredith Rea / Denise Johnson
2026-05-03 · canebrake tennis 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Saulters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · canebrake tennis 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · canebrake tennis 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christi Dyess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 57.7% of games
3.0
100%
14W–0L · 78.6% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 63.1% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova