← Search

Jamie Lichtle

Rochester Hills, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 69W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jamie Lichtle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jaclyn Pulice championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Julie Gardzinski / Pam Kloet
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jaclyn Pulice championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Sheryl Eckert / Jason Chen
2026-08-04 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Madden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Julie Ewy / Elizabeth King
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Jaclyn Pulice championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jacqueline Coffman / Kelly Moran
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Jaclyn Pulice championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-5
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Jaclyn Pulice championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martin Bak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · LT-Pietrangelo 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Madden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Pulice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · LT-Szymanski 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Pulice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · WESS-Li 18s 3.5 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Pulice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · LT-Donovan 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 61.8% of games
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 65.2% of games
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.7% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#1 Singles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova