← Search

Meg Iverson

Franklin, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 79W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meg Iverson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Chinnaiyan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Elizabeth King / Wendy Langrock
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Katherine Noser championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison DeCapite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-01 · BHAMCC-Lehman 18s 3.5 NW F3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison DeCapite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · BHAMCC-Lehman 18s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · FAC-Nix 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison DeCapite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · FAC- Brandt 18s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Sengupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · FAC-Bartholomew 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nury Steiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · BHAMCC-Lehman 18s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Arndt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · FAC-Nix 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lesson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · BHAMCC-Lehman 18s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
71.9%
46W–18L · 58.5% of games
4.0
46.3%
19W–22L · 47.6% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
16%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King