← Search

Warren Stanton

— year-end
160 matches · 105W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Warren Stanton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-09-08 · JLenz/DDemaine (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacob Lenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-09-03 · LLKI-King/HNP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Larry Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-31 · LLKI-King/HNP · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean Karasik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · JLenz/DDemaine (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gavin Ciganek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · JLenz/DDemaine (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacob Lenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · JLenz/DDemaine (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jacob Lenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · LLKI-King/HNP · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Larry Gao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Harvey Harris / Brooke Harris
2026-07-29 · MLKH-Hallman/NMP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Huggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · JLenz (Mason Wallace) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · BAdcock (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-09 · BAdcock (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joshua Mu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-08 · MLKH-Hallman/NMP · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Huggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52% of games
4.0
65.5%
38W–20L · 54.7% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 40.8% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
7.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 56.7% of games
8.5
60%
9W–6L · 54.5% of games
4.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Singles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova