← Search

Ashley Lundberg

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 52W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ashley Lundberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-05-04 · Scarborough 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Harrold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
Gina Greco / Suzanne Davis
2026-04-26 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Harrold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-10 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-06 · Scarborough 2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Castleforte
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-20 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kinder Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
L
Erica McIntyre / Molly Dye
2026-03-09 · Scarborough 2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Swanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-06 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-13 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Castleforte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-02 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Castleforte
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.9% of games
3.0
69%
29W–13L · 58.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 67.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova