← Search

Angad Mehta

Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 65W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angad Mehta to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
Andrew Leakey / Patrick Hartman
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Sisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Robbie Bauer / John Kratz
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Sisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · MSIL A18&O 4.0M Scaggs-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lino Jo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
Noel Castro / Elijah Leffelman
2026-05-10 · MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Cheung-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Sarol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · MSIL 7.0 Mixed 40&O Wang-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JOOYEN KIM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-25 · MSIL 7.0 Mixed 40&O Wang-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karolyn Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
Sean Miller / Janet Hogan
2026-03-28 · MSIL 7.0 Mixed 40&O Wang-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with JOOYEN KIM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Kyo Nakanishi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Nancy Manolis / Carlos Flores
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · with Sarah Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Cheung-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Delanois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-01 · MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Cheung-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Sarol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · with Teri Scaggs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.4% of games
4.0
60%
9W–6L · 55.2% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 70.6% of games
7.5mixed
100%
10W–0L · 70% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert