← Search

Nancy Chandrasekaran

— year-end
54 matches · 25W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nancy Chandrasekaran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara Steinhausler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara Steinhausler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-23 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stefenie Block
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Chancey Thompson / Kelly Irvine
2026-04-21 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Philips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Blake Adams / Sherene Katzman
2026-03-30 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Philips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · Rohlinger/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Miklos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-06 · Ewing/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-11-04 · Ewing/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-30 · Ewing/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Gillum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-27 · Ewing/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-23 · Ewing/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 63% of games
3.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 43.2% of games
5.5
70%
7W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–7L · 28.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#1 Singles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert