← Search

Rebecca Hinds

— year-end
41 matches · 13W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Hinds to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Wilson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Francis Mcrae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · Silk/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tanner Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · Silk/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Colleen Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Wilson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Gilluly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · Silk/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Allison Becksfort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elza McKenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Lewis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Collette Reid-Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-16 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Worrell Sterling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · Lewis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Ratton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Pisoni/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tanner Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Green / Morgan Burton
2026-05-02 · Smith/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
22.6%
7W–24L · 39.4% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.4% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer