← Search

Nicole Brkic

— year-end
112 matches · 64W–48L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nicole Brkic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Churchey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicky Wander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Harriet Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Churchey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-19 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Harriet Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Tracy Pope / Cindy Miller
2026-08-18 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Mullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Dacus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Laura Collins / Shannon Finks
2026-07-07 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debi Bird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kennedy Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alyssa Pahules
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debi Bird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Siler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams30 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.1% of games
3.0
60%
18W–12L · 53.6% of games
3.5
50%
22W–22L · 50.9% of games
5.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games
6.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 57.1% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#2 Singles
12%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe