← Search

Krissy Campbell

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 82W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Krissy Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-07-24 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keiko Fukuzawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · NMAC.Alex · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Richard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · NMAC.Alex · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keiko Fukuzawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · NMAC.Alex · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naomi Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Christina Jenkins / Emily Larson
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Marcy Points championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Merri Metcalf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Allenoush Beard
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · NMAC.Alex · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Bechtholdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · NMAC.Alex · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Bechtholdt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-29 · TOC.Armstrong · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aki Yamatani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 83.2% of games
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 57.1% of games
3.5
84.6%
33W–6L · 63.2% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.6% of games
5.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 60.4% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.2% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova