← Search

Naomi Rodrigues

— year-end
207 matches · 145W–62L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Naomi Rodrigues to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history207 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Ch.Wiltberger40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julia Wade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · Er.Wynia18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Klinefelter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-02 · TOC.Barclay · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Marie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · TOC.Armstrong · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonia Laflamme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-28 · TOC.Barclay · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Marie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Gabrielle Shields / Nicole Peterson
2026-08-26 · Er.Wynia18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cary Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · TOC.Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachael Kiker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · TOC.Barclay · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Marie Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · Ch.Wiltberger40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Riddick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · TOC.Armstrong · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cary Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · TOC.Barclay · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Courtney Pierron / Lindsey Webber
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Lindsay Murdock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Teams70 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 72% of games
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 74.1% of games
3.5
77.1%
54W–16L · 60.5% of games
4.0
63%
17W–10L · 53% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 40.8% of games
6.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.3% of games
7.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
47 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert