← Search

Todd Rawley

— year-end
114 matches · 72W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Todd Rawley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-06-24 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 2-0
W
2026-05-31 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Leso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · A RP: Quack Attack/Allard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-18 · RP: A It Was All A Dream/Lombardo · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-15 · RP: Lombardo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hernan Lombardo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-11 · RP: A It Was All A Dream/Lombardo · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-09 · RP: A It Was All A Dream/Lombardo · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-25 · RP: Lombardo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-23 · RP: A It Was All A Dream/Lombardo · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-14 · RP: A It Was All A Dream/Lombardo · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Allard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-04 · RP: Lombardo · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-3, 0-1
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76.4%
42W–13L · 57.7% of games
4.0
17.2%
5W–24L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
82.1%
23W–5L · 60.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
20 matches
#2 Singles
14%
16 matches
#1 Singles
13%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal