← Search

Jenay Boggs

Memphis, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 10W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jenay Boggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2026-04-30 · Hartman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susannah Mays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Hartman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Esposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · Hartman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Avant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-30 · Hartman/Memphis · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Angie Moore / Amanda Scott
2025-10-02 · Hartman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Meagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
Angie Moore / Catherine Brimhall
2025-04-24 · Turner/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-08 · Turner/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Callie Mejia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-11-22 · Turner/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susannah Mays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-10-17 · Turner/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Esposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-16 · Turner/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lexis Zellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-09-07 · Meagle/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer Gladstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-08-03 · Meagle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Catherine Lackie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 41.1% of games
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 44.8% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches
#1 Singles
12%
2 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer