← Search

Tricia Bergeron

— year-end
73 matches · 34W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tricia Bergeron to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debbie Churchey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Cary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roz Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Angie Kilpatrick / Kelly Baker
2026-06-10 · Wittke/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Glaucia Novoa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-07 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Churchey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hauber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-29 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Harriet Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Dacus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Janet Grillis / Amanda Scott
2026-04-02 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-25 · Churchey/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Harriet Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-19 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Dacus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60.5%
26W–17L · 54.4% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 41.4% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert