← Search

Catherine Lackie

Memphis, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 21W–21L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Catherine Lackie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
Jennifer Lee / Elza McKenna
2026-09-01 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-27 · Glisson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Maureen Esposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-14 · Glisson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Anne Pohlman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · Hartman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Meagle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-29 · Anderson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Avant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Hartman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · Anderson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Gladstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · Hartman/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Avant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Anderson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Karen Franklin / Harriet Dodd
2026-03-18 · Anderson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Gladstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-17 · Hartman/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-17 · Hartman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Avant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.7% of games
3.0
48%
12W–13L · 47.9% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova