← Search

Mary Clare Rosemeyer

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 123W–43L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mary Clare Rosemeyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Me.Delorme18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alison Watterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Me.Delorme18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Melissa DeLorme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · TOC.Murdock · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · Me.Delorme18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ayako Otsuka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Murdock · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Li.Murdock18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Farleigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-0
W
Sarah Johnson
2026-07-26 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Austin Taylor
2026-07-26 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
Carolyn Stephens / Emily Lowery
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Carly Kouskolekas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Sara Wallingford
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Angeline Huynh / Courtney McGraw
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Carly Kouskolekas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Sarah Johnson
2026-07-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 66.4% of games
4.0
89.8%
44W–5L · 67.2% of games
4.5
50%
11W–11L · 49.1% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 68.2% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.1% of games
8.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.4% of games
4.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 76.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 68.5% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#2 Singles
14%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
19 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer