← Search

Hannah Boghosian

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 59W–50L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Hannah Boghosian to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-09-12 · ACP.Tandradinata · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aulia Tandradinata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-09 · ACP.Paul · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Kuzma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Le.Barter18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-26 · Le.Barter18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Arcos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · LBible.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Sinclair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Me.Golder18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Claire Hying
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · TOC.Rider · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Me.Golder18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meryl Golder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-05 · TOC.Rider · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Nile Testerman / Wendy Jackson
2026-08-03 · Lo.Hatlen18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Shait mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Me.Golder18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elena Pinkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Me.Golder18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elena Pinkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
65%
13W–7L · 56.7% of games
4.0
59.5%
25W–17L · 52.5% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 49.4% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert