← Search

Meredith Buckner

— year-end
69 matches · 55W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Meredith Buckner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-08-30 · NuyenNiethammer/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Nuyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-25 · NuyenNiethammer/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · MauteBuckner /Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · MauteBuckner /Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colbey Keele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · MauteBuckner /Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-02 · MauteBuckner /Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · MauteBuckner /Knoxville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Nikki Tilson / Karen Collins
2026-03-07 · Hayes/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Niethammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-27 · Hayes/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colbey Keele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-15 · Hayes/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Maute
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-13 · Hayes/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chelsea Maute
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-01-09 · Hayes/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Niethammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
94.1%
16W–1L · 74.2% of games
3.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 65% of games
3.5
65%
13W–7L · 54.9% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 67% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#1 Singles
30%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova