← Search

Elaine Hudson

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 62W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Elaine Hudson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Ma.Cambo18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Charlino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-25 · Ma.Cambo18C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · ACP.Cambo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madeline Cambo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-22 · Ma.Cambo18C7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Cecco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · ACP.Tandradinata · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · LBible.7.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keshia Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · Ma.Cambo18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Charlino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Allison DeMacy / Lauren King
2026-07-18 · Ma.Cambo18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · Ma.Cambo18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · TOC.Andrews · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · Ma.Cambo18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Ma.Cambo18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
86.2%
25W–4L · 67.9% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 54% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.8% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 57% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe