← Search

Ashley Powers

Eads, TN
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 15W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Ashley Powers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Glisson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alexandra Morin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-19 · Folk/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mary Anne Pohlman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · Glisson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brittany Glisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Folk/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Anna Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Laura Weaver / Tracy Lombardo
2026-04-29 · Powers/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Temika Barber
2026-04-22 · Powers/Memphis · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-15 · Powers/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allie Baty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · Powers/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jade Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · Anderson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krystal Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-18 · Powers/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Anna Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-19 · McDermott/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-12 · McDermott/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 46.5% of games
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.9% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer