← Search

Mary Anne Pohlman

— year-end
26 matches · 12W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mary Anne Pohlman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Folk/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sarah Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Glisson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shanleigh Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · Glisson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Shanleigh Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Folk/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ashley Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · Glisson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Catherine Lackie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · Folk/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tressa Ogles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-22 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tressa Ogles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
Shaila Anderson / Cheryl Hitchcock
2026-04-15 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Cleeton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-01 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Amber McCabe / Anna Smith
2026-03-25 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Mary Wilkes Yonchak / Laura Weaver
2025-11-05 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allison Cleeton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-30 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Taylor Weston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams8 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
35%
7W–13L · 41.1% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer