← Search

Elza McKenna

Memphis, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 28W–36L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elza McKenna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Wiuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-01 · Sampson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-27 · Brand/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Martha Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-20 · Brand/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Martha Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Brand/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kristi Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Sampson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melanie Schrank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
JoAnn Cooper / Brooke Smith
2026-08-05 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sheila Carro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-23 · Franks/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Hinds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Tidwell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Casey Tidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Tidwell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chancey Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Tidwell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Casey Tidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.8% of games
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.8% of games
3.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 35.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 60.2% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal