← Search

Jill Grego

New Haven, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 44W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jill Grego to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-06-27 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Sikora/Lorenzetti · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
W
2026-06-06 · MIT:Give Me a Break:Walsky/Pillig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Salcedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · MIL: What a Racket 40+: Consiglio · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Trevethan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · MIT: Milford Indoor Tennis: Sikora/Lorenzetti · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · Jill Grego · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · MIL: What a Racket 40+: Consiglio · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-04 · MIT: Mixed 18+ 7.0:McVoy/Kreiger · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henrik McVoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-29 · NHH: Mixology: Sookvaree · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Genovese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-27 · MIT: Mixed 18+ 7.0:McVoy/Kreiger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Harder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · MIT: Mixed 18+ 7.0:McVoy/Kreiger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nick Genovese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-08 · MIL: What a Racket 40+: Consiglio · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.8% of games
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert