← Search

Sarah Huber

— year-end
67 matches · 49W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sarah Huber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
Annie Zabar / Lauren Stern
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-23 · NC: 40 Love: Weitz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Weitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-18 · CP: SYR Doubled: Piazza/Hodgson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Fix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · GCC: Net Rushers (NY) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-27 · CP:Lonoya:Hoffman/Bedoya · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Polizzi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · GCC: Net Rushers (NY) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · GCC: Net Rushers (NY) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-1
W
2026-02-26 · GCC: Net Rushers (NY) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-12 · CP:Serve Me A Double:Hodgson/Huber · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
W
2026-02-11 · CP:Serve Me Another:Eilertsen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mia Mihopoulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-06 · GCC: Net Rushers (NY) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams27 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.2%
27W–12L · 56.4% of games
4.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.3% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova