← Search

James Bremar

Springboro, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 68W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Bremar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-16 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Bremar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Fahrenholz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · SRTC-Miller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Bremar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-20 · QRRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Madoffori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-31 · SRTC-Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Fahrenholz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-17 · QRRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Madoffori
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · SRTC-Garofoli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Chillinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · QRRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Petsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · SRTC-Garofoli · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Bremar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · SRTC-Garofoli · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Kissel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-01-23 · SRTC-Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Bremar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.4%
31W–23L · 51.7% of games
4.0
26.8%
11W–30L · 41.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.7% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
41.5%
17W–24L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal