← Search

Mari Stratemeier

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 86W–49L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mari Stratemeier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-08-26 · La.Kane18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · La.Kane18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erika Clausson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · KF.Scagnelli · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robyn Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · La.Kane18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · La.Kane18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erika Clausson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-15 · KF.Scagnelli · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · BENT.Stratemeier · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gwen Louis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · NMAC.Wadsworth · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Jessica Williams / Samantha Pickett
2026-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Keeley McCormick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · NMAC.Stratemeier · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-01 · KF.Scagnelli · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Latzy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Hilt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 64% of games
2.5
71.4%
30W–12L · 63% of games
3.0
63.8%
30W–17L · 56% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 51% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.7% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#1 Singles
15%
20 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams