← Search

Casey Hale

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 145W–83L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Casey Hale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
Susan Fekete / Kelly Moore
2026-09-11 · MD.Park · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Starritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-01 · Ma.Gonella18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · MD.Park · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · MD.Merchant · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · MD.Park · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophea Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · MD.Merchant · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
Susan Cook / Marina Barthalmus
2026-08-14 · Ma.Gonella40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brigette Flower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Merri Metcalf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Li Zhuang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · MD.Park · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachael Kiker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Bernier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.2% of games
3.0
74.3%
26W–9L · 60.8% of games
3.5
70%
42W–18L · 58.9% of games
4.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 46.4% of games
5.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.2% of games
6.5
73.5%
25W–9L · 64.3% of games
7.5
42.3%
11W–15L · 50.1% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60.9% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 70.7% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
72 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova