← Search

Amber Bruner

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 95W–125L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amber Bruner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Shukla · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Latzy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · TOC.Shukla · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Miho Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · MLong.3.5T.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · MLong.3.5T.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · MLong.3.5T.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yvonne Acker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · MLong.3.5T.40-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Jabusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Ch.Hochstrasser40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Hellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Ch.Hochstrasser40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Garnett Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · TOC.Hutchens · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · Sh.Chapman55A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Willey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · ABaxley-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-18 · TOC.Lyon · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Ehland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
45%
58W–71L · 49.7% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 41% of games
5.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 50.9% of games
6.5
40.9%
18W–26L · 45.1% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova