← Search

Amanda Kirtland

Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 22W–9L · seasons 2024–2025

Captains: add Amanda Kirtland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2025-10-01 · canebrake 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christi Dyess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-17 · canebrake 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lucy Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-11 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristen Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-03 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristen Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-23 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lucy Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-03 · canebrake tennis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bekah Baugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-04-23 · canebrake tennis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-15 · canebrake tennis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-04-08 · canebrake tennis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-04-07 · canebrake tennis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-04-01 · canebrake tennis · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.3% of games
3.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 67.1% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 40.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
8 matches
#2 Singles
23%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#3 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert