← Search

Allyson Tancak

Parma, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 28W–19L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Allyson Tancak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-07-24 · X18 7.0 3 MM Mei · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Michelsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · X18 8.0 MM Tancak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Fantauzzo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W MM Frazier · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W MM Frazier · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W MM Frazier · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · X18 8.0 MM Tancak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Roche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W MM Frazier · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W MM Frazier · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · X18 8.0 MM Tancak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Roche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W MM Frazier · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · A18 4.0W MM Bruckner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · X18 8.0 MM Tancak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Bryan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 57.5% of games
3.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 59.3% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova