← Search

Lauren Richards

— year-end
74 matches · 55W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lauren Richards to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jenna Baesler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Lindsey Little championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · RCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Richards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Catherine Bryan / Sarah Downey
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Jenna Baesler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · RCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tayrien Holocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · RCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Richards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Grantham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenna Baesler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenna Baesler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · RCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-21 · RCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabitha Bartel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · RCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams17 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
55%
11W–9L · 55.1% of games
3.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 72.7% of games
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.6% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova