← Search

Jenna Baesler

Erie, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 71W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jenna Baesler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-09-03 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabitha Bartel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · RCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Richards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tayrien Holocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Lauren Richards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Rachelle Schowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Tabitha Bartel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · RCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Richards mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Catherine Bryan / Sarah Downey
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Lauren Richards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · RCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Henkelmann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
Gaius Roemer / Amy Conway
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Paul Henkelmann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Andrew Grantham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 70.9% of games
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 64.2% of games
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 71.6% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams