← Search

Ann Rhoads

LITTLETON, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 119W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Rhoads to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Sprague championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Sarah Turner / Lauren Behm
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Sprague championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Erin Rhodes / Sutton Spanton
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Sprague championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Crystal Adams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Sprague championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · KC-CC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · MC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tucker Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Crystal Adams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Weeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · MC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Lennek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · KC-CC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · MC RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Atkinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
87.5%
35W–5L · 65.8% of games
3.5
72.7%
48W–18L · 58.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–11L · 26.5% of games
7.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 60.3% of games
7.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams