← Search

Michelle Knutsen

— year-end
11 matches · 0W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michelle Knutsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2026-06-06 · Crocker - Weekend Warriors · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meg Keeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-17 · Crocker - Weekend Warriors · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristina Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Crocker - Weekend Warriors · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · Crocker - Weekend Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Desiree Wing / Erin Clark
2025-05-18 · Balis- MTC Tennis the Menace · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carolina Balis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-17 · Crocker - Weekend Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cammie Furgal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-23 · Crocker - The Stonyburgs · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Crocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-08 · Crocker - The Stonyburgs · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Crocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jane Kim / Nancy Gatti
2024-11-09 · Crocker - Middleburg 5.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meg Keeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-27 · Crocker - Middleburg 5.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Meg Keeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
Nancy Gatti / Jane Kim
2024-10-06 · Crocker - Middleburg 5.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nicola Hasling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 31.4% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#2 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert