← Search

Isabel Chavez

Lincoln, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 12W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Isabel Chavez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Adams Levchenko · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Figard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kaley Kenton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Adams Levchenko · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hannah Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Figard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Figard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · Garcia/Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Seth Kingery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Figard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Figard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Bown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · Levchenko · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Bown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-29 · Levchenko · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Peirce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.3% of games
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 62% of the time
#2 Doubles
62%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal