← Search

Barbara Scribner

Lincoln, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 58W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Scribner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Ernst · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tawnie Escamilla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwen Bown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Shield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah OShea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-08 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianne Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianne Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Toalson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · Shield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Brockman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-21 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tram Rademacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Porath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.6% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games
4.0
48.6%
34W–36L · 51.3% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.6% of games
7.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 38.6% of games
8.0
41.4%
12W–17L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
19.2%
5W–21L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert