← Search

Emily Mcanelly

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 26W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Mcanelly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Gee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · Westwood Zach · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Gee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · Westwood McCrickard/Hyde · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Georgia Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Westwood Zach · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Gee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tyler Pola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tyler Pola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · Westwood Zach · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Gee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · Westwood White & Raymond · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · Westwood White & Raymond · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · Westwood White & Raymond · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 70.6% of games
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 45.9% of games
2.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova