← Search

Jasmine Kaur

Midlothian, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 20W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jasmine Kaur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Snow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Cooksey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Corazzini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Cooksey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · Woodlake Odonnell Tri Level · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikhil Sanduria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikhil Sanduria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · Woodlake Brawley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Byers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · Woodlake Brawley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Taryn Giroux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · Woodlake Phelps · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Schneeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · Woodlake Brawley · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Schneeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · Woodlake Phelps · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Learn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 52.8% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer