← Search

Katherine Margeson

— year-end
27 matches · 20W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Katherine Margeson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-07-11 · RC KRIPPEL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Brewer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · RC KRIPPEL · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Castaneda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · TCU MILAM/MILNER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Jurgensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Amelia Owre / Brooke Wright
2026-04-03 · RC CAGLE/PIGEON · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary-Alex Thacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-25 · RC CAGLE/PIGEON · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-20 · TCU MILAM/MILNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary-Alex Thacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-13 · TCU MILAM/MILNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Mckelvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-06 · RC CAGLE/PIGEON · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary-Alex Thacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-06 · TCU MILAM/MILNER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Briana Stierwalt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-02-27 · RC CAGLE/PIGEON · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Jennifer Matthews / Cindy Pappous
2026-02-20 · RC CAGLE/PIGEON · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Palko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-24 · FWCD HALPERN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrienne Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams19 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 64.4% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.1% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams