← Search

Justine Schwartz

— year-end
14 matches · 5W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Justine Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
Jamie Walker / Angie Simmons
2026-08-28 · Boswell/Schoeplein/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ruth Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-21 · Boswell/Schoeplein/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Morgan Culpepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Bonds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meaghan Stranix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Constance Michelle Nixon / Michele Grefrath
2026-07-16 · Bonds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Cockrel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-04-27 · Bowers/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emma Saddler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · Rogers/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Ogrady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · Bowers/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-06 · Sengvilay/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-11-03 · Sengvilay/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Sengvilay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-28 · Sengvilay/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-16 · Bailey/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Grace Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-26 · Bailey/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Bonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams9 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 45.1% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova